[spb_text_block pb_margin_bottom=”no” pb_border_bottom=”no” width=”1/1″ el_position=”first last”]

A HOLOGRAPHIC UNIVERSE?

“When Matter Acts Out, Time Becomes Slippery, and Solids Aren’t So Solid”

[/spb_text_block] [spb_accordion width=”1/1″ el_position=”first last”] [spb_accordion_tab title=”DNA teleported into vial of pure water” accordion_id=”” icon=””] [spb_text_block pb_margin_bottom=”no” pb_border_bottom=”no” width=”1/1″ el_position=”first last”]

Water is more than an excellent unzipper of molecular compounds. If you look at it as a simple coupling of three atoms and nothing more, you might miss something.

In 2011, Nobel laureate Luc Montagnier demonstrated “DNA teleportation,” where ordinary water molecules in a sealed test tube assembled into DNA. A tube with ordinary water was placed next to another tube that had water with trace amounts of DNA in it. Both tubes were electrified with a weak 7Hz current. Some of the hydrogen and oxygen molecules in the tube with pure, sterile water transformed into DNA — by a process still unknown to Western science. [1]

1) Quick synopsis: http://www.techhive.com/article/216767/dna_molecules_can_teleport_nobel_winner_says.html

Full paper: http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1012/1012.5166v1.pdf

[/spb_text_block] [/spb_accordion_tab] [spb_accordion_tab title=”All Matter is Merely Vacuum Fluctuations” accordion_id=”” icon=””] [spb_text_block pb_margin_bottom=”no” pb_border_bottom=”no” width=”1/1″ el_position=”first last”]

“Matter is built on flaky foundations. Physicists have now confirmed that the apparently substantial stuff is actually no more than fluctuations in the quantum vacuum.

The researchers simulated the frantic activity that goes on inside protons and neutrons. These particles provide almost all the mass of ordinary matter.

Each proton (or neutron) is made of three quarks – but the individual masses of these quarks only add up to about 1% of the proton’s mass. So what accounts for the rest of it?

Theory says it is created by the force that binds quarks together, called the strong nuclear force. In quantum terms, the strong force is carried by a field of virtual particles called gluons, randomly popping into existence and disappearing again. The energy of these vacuum fluctuations has to be included in the total mass of the proton and neutron.

But it has taken decades to work out the actual numbers. The strong force is described by the equations of quantum chromodynamics, or QCD, which are too difficult to solve in most cases.

So physicists have developed a method called lattice QCD, which models smooth space and time as a grid of separate points. This pixellated approach allows the complexities of the strong force to be simulated approximately by computer.

Until recently, lattice QCD calculations concentrated on the virtual gluons, and ignored another important component of the vacuum: pairs of virtual quarks and antiquarks.

Quark-antiquark pairs can pop up and momentarily transform a proton into a different, more exotic particle. In fact, the true proton is the sum of all these possibilities going on at once.

Virtual quarks make the calculations much more complicated, involving a matrix of more than 10,000 trillion numbers, says team member Stephan Dürr of the John von Neumann Institute for Computing in Jülich, Germany.

“There is no computer on Earth that could possibly store such a big matrix in its memory,” Dürr told New Scientist, “so some trickery goes into evaluating it.”

…

Although physicists expected theory to match experiment eventually, it is an important landmark. “The great thing is it shows that you can get close to experiments,” says Davies. “Now we know that lattice QCD works, we want to make accurate calculations of particle properties, not just mass.”

That will allow physicists to test QCD, and look for effects beyond known physics. For now, Dürr’s calculation shows that QCD describes quark-based particles accurately, and tells us that most of our mass comes from virtual quarks and gluons fizzing away in the quantum vacuum.

The Higgs field is also thought to make a small contribution, giving mass to individual quarks as well as to electrons and some other particles. The Higgs field creates mass out of the quantum vacuum too, in the form of virtual Higgs bosons. So if the LHC confirms that the Higgs exists, it will mean all reality is virtual.”

 

Now then! Here’s a whopper of a source. You know the all-too-solid reality you’ve known and loved? Turns out it’s blipping in and out of existence millions of times a second.

So, not at all solid.

If our reality is being pieced back together again from quantum foam in an endless cycle, maybe there’s a way to have things arrange themselves differently.

Maybe, by more expertly utilizing the subtle energy that underlies this universe, we can tweak ourselves and our world.

Your life is far more based in the invisible and non-solid than you might’ve imagined.

Oh, and the Higgs boson? It’s been found.

 

1) https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16095-its-confirmed-matter-is-merely-vacuum-fluctuations/

2) https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/how-the-higgs-boson-was-found-4723520/

[/spb_text_block] [/spb_accordion_tab] [/spb_accordion] [spb_text_block pb_margin_bottom=”no” pb_border_bottom=”no” width=”1/1″ el_position=”first last”]

Psi

“When Cognition Goes Further than the Inside of a Skull”

[/spb_text_block] [spb_accordion width=”1/1″ el_position=”first last”] [spb_accordion_tab title=”Grinberg: two people, in separate rooms, share brain state” accordion_id=”” icon=””] [spb_text_block pb_margin_bottom=”no” pb_border_bottom=”no” width=”1/1″ el_position=”first last”]

In order to test whether a brain is capable of “communicating” to another over a distance, Grinberg would involve two people in an experiment. These two people, who were usually a male-female couple, would sit together and meditate for 20 minutes so they could form a close bond with each other.

After this, they were put into separate rooms which were shielded from all electromagnetic fields. The brainwaves of both participants would begin to noticeably synchronize, which Grinberg could measure on their EEG readouts. In addition, he found that both hemispheres would show the same patterns in each person’s brain. This sort of synchronization would normally only happen in deep meditation. Lastly, the person who had the most coherent and well-organized brainwaves seemed to exert a greater influence upon the other. [1]

A few years later Grinberg take the experiment a little further. For the most part it was the same: two people would meditate together for twenty minutes, then split up into separate, shielded rooms. This time he went ahead and flashed bright lights into one of the participants eyes, which caused them to experience sudden shocks. Each time a trial was run, one hundred individual flashes of light were administered at random. 25% of the time these were flashed in one person’s eyes, the other person had a strikingly similar brainwave “jolt” so to speak—and this happened at the exact same time. The control subjects did not show any such connections. [2]

1) Grinberg-Zylberbaum, Jacobo, and Ramos, J. “Patterns of interhemisphere correlations during human communication.” International Journal of Neuroscience, 1987; 36: 41-53; Grinberg-Zylberbaum, J. et al., “Human Communication and the electrophysiological activity of the brain.” Subtle Energies, 1992; 3(3): 25-43.

2) Grinberg-Zylberbaum, Jacobo. “The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox in the Brain; The Transferred Potential.” Physics Essays 7,(4), 1994.

[/spb_text_block] [/spb_accordion_tab] [spb_accordion_tab title=”The transmission of pain from one person to another” accordion_id=”” icon=””] [spb_text_block pb_margin_bottom=”no” pb_border_bottom=”no” width=”1/1″ el_position=”first last”]

Dr. Charles Tart, from Berkeley, set up an interesting experiment where he gave himself painful electric shocks, automatically. When this happened he then attempted to “send” his pain to another person who was the “receiver.” The target of his intentions was wired up to measure heart rate, blood volume and other physiological signals. Tart found that the receiver’s body did in fact respond to the shocks—through things such as an increase in heart rate and a decrease in blood volume—but the receiver had no conscious knowledge of when Dr. Tart was sending them. [1]

 

1) Tart, Charles. “Physiological Correlates of Psi Cognition.” International Journal of Parapsychology, 1963: 5; 375-86.

[/spb_text_block] [/spb_accordion_tab] [spb_accordion_tab title=”Remote Influence on people, animals… and blood?” accordion_id=”” icon=””] [spb_text_block pb_margin_bottom=”no” pb_border_bottom=”no” width=”1/1″ el_position=”first last”]

Dr. Braud ran the full scientific gamut when it came to the effect of remote influence on biological systems. This journal entry covers multiple experiments of unique natures.

One series of tests involved 271 individuals. Labeled the “electrodermal influence” series, which measured the amount of electrical activity taking place across the skin. This was chosen because such measurements “are readily made, are sensitive indicators, and are known to be useful peripheral measures of the activity of the sympathetic branch of the automatic nervous system.” A group of influencers would attempt a number of actions upon the “influencees”, with statistically significant differences in their electrodermal activity. One of these actions involved the influencer staring at the influencee through a monitor, attempting to “get their attention,” though only when directed to by a random number generator. This appears to lend credence to the phenomenon of one somehow “knowing” they’re being stared at. That odd sensation you feel may very well incorporate the electrodermal response that was recorded here.

Other studies in this journal entry covered remote influence upon muscle tremors, blood pressure, freely swimming knife fish (Gymnotus carapo) and the rate that Mongolian gerbils ran on an activity wheel.

Lastly I’ll mention a unique experiment that involved human red blood cells in a test tube. The tube also contained a saline solution with enough salt in it to kill the cells. Braud had his participants focus their minds on the goal of protecting these cells from bursting open. This was verified by measuring how much light could pass through the solution. The more the cells broke down, the more transparent the solution became. Thus, the less light that shone through, the healthier the cells were. [1]

I’ll include a URL of this journal entry’s PDF, as it is an easily readable document that many of you will find fascinating.

1) Braud, W. and Schlitz, M. J. “Consciousness interactions with remote biological systems: anomalous intentionality effects.” Subtle Energies, 1991; 2(1): 1-46.

URL of PDF: journals.sfu.ca/seemj/index.php/seemj/article/download/112/94

[/spb_text_block] [/spb_accordion_tab] [spb_accordion_tab title=”The Sense of Being Stared At” accordion_id=”” icon=””] [spb_text_block pb_margin_bottom=”no” pb_border_bottom=”no” width=”1/1″ el_position=”first last”]

Continuing with the work of Dr. Braud, here are some further experiments and publications that delve into just what happens when one person states intently at another without their knowledge. This was introduced in the tab above this one, though it was getting a little long in the tooth so… we’re expanding.

You ever feel someone staring at you, only to spin around and discover you were correct? That’s precisely what Braud was investigating here, and he confirmed that it really works. He placed one person in a private room with a small video camera, wired him up to a polygraph machine and told him to relax. In another room there was a monitor which showed the first participant. This room with the monitor had a second participant, who was told to stare intently at this person on the monitor to attempt and get his attention, though only when a random number generator told him to. As it turned out, when the first person was being stared at, significant electrical spikes were measured in his skin. On average this occurred 59% of the time he was stared at, rather than the 50% that would be expected by random chance. 59% might not sound that impressive, but a nine percent increase above chance is considered highly substantial. [1]

Dr, Braud then changed the experiment. His participants would now meet each other before the trial took place, staring deep into each other’s eyes as they spoke. They were encouraged to get comfortable with each other. Now, when the person was stared at by his new friend, he noticeably relaxed on an electrical level. [2]

Rupert Sheldrake, another fellow I’ll mention on this page, is renown for investigating unique phenomenon like these, and performed his own experiments to prove that “the sense of being stared at” is indeed genuine through multiple, published experiments. [3]

 

1) Schlitz, M. and LaBerge, S. “Autonomic detection of remote observation: two conceptual replications.” In Bierman (ed), Proceedings of Presented Papers: 465-78.

2) Braud, W., et al.: “Further Studies of autonomic detection of remote staring: replication, new control procedures and personality correlates.” Journal of Parapsychology, 1993; 57: 391-409.

3) Sheldrake, Rupert. Scientific Papers on the Sense of Being Stared At. Sheldrake.org. http://www.sheldrake.org/research/sense-of-being-stared-at (Accessed April 2016)

[/spb_text_block] [/spb_accordion_tab] [spb_accordion_tab title=”Relaxation at a Distance” accordion_id=”” icon=””] [spb_text_block pb_margin_bottom=”no” pb_border_bottom=”no” width=”1/1″ el_position=”first last”]

Minor anxiety orders, such as nervousness and the inability to concentrate, were measurably improved in Dr. Braud’s research.

Braud and an anthropologist named Marilyn Schlitz studied a group of highly nervous people along with a group of calmer people. The nervousness of each group, in this case, could be directly measured by the amount of electrical activity on their skin. In some cases, the groups were given common relaxation techniques and instructed to calm themselves down. In other cases Braud and Schlitz tried to calm them down by simply concentrating on them from another room.

The originally calm group showed very little change by practicing their exercises or being “remote influenced,” but the nervous group became much calmer—in both cases. Surprisingly, Braud and Schlitz’s remote influencing effects upon the nervous group worked almost as well as any relaxation exercises they did for themselves. [1] Similarly, when Braud and Schlitz remotely concentrated on someone in an attempt to help him focus on attention, the subject had an immediate improvement. The people whose minds were the most apt to wander gained the strongest benefits from this process. [2]

Thankfully Braud also found out that we are not helpless against these remote influences—we can shield the ones we don’t want. [3] If you visualize a protective shield, a safe, a barrier or a screen—whatever you feel comfortable with—you can indeed stop these influences from affecting you. [4] The remote influencers did not know which participants were trying to block their thoughts, but the people who did try to shield themselves were successful. [5]

 

1) Braud, W. and Schlitz, M. Psychokinetic influence on electrodermal activity. Journal of Parapsychology, 1983; 47(2): 95-119.

2) Braud, W. et al.: “Attention focusing facilitated through remote mental interaction.” Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 1995; 89(2): 103-15.

3) Braud, W. G. “Blocking/shielding psychic functioning through psychological and psychic techniques: a report of three preliminary studies.” In White, R. and Solfvin, I. (eds), Research in Parapsychology, 1984 Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press, 1985, pp. 42-44.

4) Braud, W. G., “Implications and applications of laboratory psi findings.” European Journal of Parapsychology, 1990-91; 8: 57-65.

5) Braud, W., et al. “Further studies of the bio-PK effect: feedback, blocking, generality/specificity.” In White, R. and Solfvin, I. (eds), Research in Parapsychology: 45-48.

[/spb_text_block] [/spb_accordion_tab] [spb_accordion_tab title=”A Number of Examples of Brains Affecting the Outside World” accordion_id=”” icon=””] [spb_text_block pb_margin_bottom=”no” pb_border_bottom=”no” width=”1/1″ el_position=”first last”]

Instead of writing these all out individually, I’ll dump these all together in one tab. Perhaps I’ll give them their own personal send offs later. Ahem…

Several generations of scientists have now amassed considerable evidence in support of long distance rapport among people.  Numerous studies have provided evidence that identifiable and consistent electrical brain signals (as distinguished from electrical brain signals occurring during control periods) occurred in one person when a distant second person was either meditating or provided with sensory stimulation, or when a distant person attempted to communicate with the subject being monitored.

 

1. Orme-Johnson DW, Dillbeck MC, Wallace RK, Landrith GS III. Intersubject EEG coherence: Is consciousness a field? Int J Neurosci. 1982;16:203-209.

2. Travis FT, Orme-Johnson DW. Field model of consciousness: EEG, coherence changes as indicators of field effects. Int J Neurosci. 1989;49:203.

3. Duane T, Behrendt T. Extrasensory electroencephalographic induction between identical twins. Science. 1965;150:367.

4. Hearne, KMT. Visually evoked responses and ESP. J Soc Psychic Res. 1977;49:648-657.

5. Grinberg-Zylberbaum J, Ramos J. Patterns of interhemispheric correlation during human communication. Int J Neurosci. 1987;36(1,2):41-55.

6. Grinberg-Zylberbaum J, Delaflor M, Attie L, Goswami A. The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox in the brain: the transferred potential. Phys Essays. 1994;7(4):422-428.

7. Lloyd DH. Objective events in the brain correlated with psychic phenomena. New Horiz. 1973;1(2):69-75.

8. May EC, Targ R, Puthoff HE. EEG correlates to remote light flashes under conditions of sensory shielding. In: Tart C, Puthoff HE, Targ R, eds. Mind at Large. New York, NY: Praeger; 1979:127-136.

9. Millay J. Brainwave synchronization: a study of subtle forms of communication. Humanistic Psychology Institute Review. 1981;3(1):9-40.

10. Puthoff HE, Targ R. A perceptual channel for information transfer over kilometer distances: historical perspective and recent research. Proceedings of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineering. 1976;64:349-354.

11. Targ R, Puthoff HE. Information transmission under conditions of sensory shielding. Nature. 1974;252:602-607.

[/spb_text_block] [/spb_accordion_tab] [/spb_accordion] [spb_text_block pb_margin_bottom=”no” pb_border_bottom=”no” width=”1/1″ el_position=”first last”]

Biological Oddities

“When Life Doesn’t Match Our High School Textbooks”

[/spb_text_block] [spb_accordion width=”1/1″ el_position=”first last”] [spb_accordion_tab title=”Creation of Duck/Chicken hybrids via weak EM field” accordion_id=”” icon=””] [spb_text_block pb_margin_bottom=”no” pb_border_bottom=”no” width=”1/1″ el_position=”first last”]

Korean scientist Dr. Dzang Kangeng received patent #N1828665 for a device that used microwaves to transfer the DNA-wave information of a duck into a pregnant mother hen. Roughly 80 percent of her eggs hatched as half-duck, half-chicken hybrids. [1]

1) Section XII of paper: http://www.emergentmind.org/gariaevI2.htm

[/spb_text_block] [/spb_accordion_tab] [spb_accordion_tab title=”Seeds reverted to extinct variants via weak EM field” accordion_id=”” icon=””] [spb_text_block pb_margin_bottom=”no” pb_border_bottom=”no” width=”1/1″ el_position=”first last”]

The chemical corporation Ciba-Geigy discovered they could transform existing plant seeds into extinct varieties — simply by zapping them with a weak electrostatic current. This generated stronger and faster-growing wheat, extinct fern species and tulips with thorns.

They received patent number 0351357 for this discovery, and it was titled “Improved Cultivation Technique”. [1]

1) Fosar, Grazyna and Bludorf, Franz. “The Living Internet (Part 2).” April 2002. http://web.archive.org/web/20030701194920/http://www.baerbelmohr.de/english/magazin/beitraege/hyper2.htm (accessed April 2016)

 

[/spb_text_block] [/spb_accordion_tab] [spb_accordion_tab title=”Apricots to apples, rat grows a cat’s tail” accordion_id=”” icon=””] [spb_text_block pb_margin_bottom=”no” pb_border_bottom=”no” width=”1/1″ el_position=”first last”]

Italian scientist Pier Luigi Ighina energetically transformed a living apricot tree into an apple tree, actually causing the fruits on the branches to metamorphosize in 16 days. He also zapped a rat with DNA-wave information from a cat, causing the rat to grow a cat-like tail in four days. [1]

This one will be harder for most to stomach. Since no lab would have him to verify his work, there’s no official study to link to. The scientific community was, in all, not a fan of this fellow. If anyone has a brilliant concept, and it flies in the face of conventional understanding, he or she will, on average, experience the same outcome.

Nevertheless, it appears he was following a similar methodology that others on this research page conducted. They had labs. So if nothing else, see this as an extension of the others.

1) Vintini, Leonardo. “The Strange Inventions of Pier L. Ighina,” The Epoch Times, September 25-October 1, 2008, p. B6. http://printarchive.epochtimes.com/a1/en/us/bos/2008/09-Sep/25/B6.pdf (accessed April 2016)

[/spb_text_block] [/spb_accordion_tab] [/spb_accordion] [spb_text_block pb_margin_bottom=”no” pb_border_bottom=”no” width=”1/1″ el_position=”first last”]

Establishment Woes

“When It’s More of a Hindrance Than Not.”

[/spb_text_block] [spb_accordion width=”1/1″ el_position=”first last”] [spb_accordion_tab title=”Thousands of Patents Made Confidential by Government” accordion_id=”” icon=””] [spb_text_block pb_margin_bottom=”no” pb_border_bottom=”no” width=”1/1″ el_position=”first last”]

As of 1997, the US Patent Office has classified over 3,000 patent devices or applications under the secrecy order, Title 35, U.S. Code (1952) Sections 181-188. (1)

By the end of 2010, that number had ballooned up to 5,135 (2). This source does a rather nice and quick explanation of it all, so rather than sum it up we’ll go ahead and do a direct copy-paste:

“Under the Invention Secrecy Act of 1951, patent applications on new inventions can be subject to secrecy orders restricting their publication if government agencies believe that disclosure would be “detrimental to the national security.”

The current list of technology areas that is used to screen patent applications for possible restriction under the Invention Secrecy Act is not publicly available and has been denied under the Freedom of Information Act.  (An appeal is pending.)  But a previous list dated 1971 and obtained by researcher Michael Ravnitzky is available here (pdf).

Most of the listed technology areas are closely related to military applications.  But some of them range more widely.

Thus, the 1971 list indicates that patents for solar photovoltaic generators were subject to review and possible restriction if the photovoltaics were more than 20% efficient.  Energy conversion systems were likewise subject to review and possible restriction if they offered conversion efficiencies “in excess of 70-80%.”

One may fairly ask if disclosure of such technologies could really have been “detrimental to the national security,” or whether the opposite would be closer to the truth.  One may further ask what comparable advances in technology may be subject to restriction and non-disclosure today.  But no answers are forthcoming, and the invention secrecy system persists with no discernible external review.”

1) Bailey, Patrick G. and Grotz, Toby. “A Critical Review of the Available Information Regarding Claims of Zero-Point Energy, Free-Energy, and Over-Unity Experiments of the 28th IECEC, April 3, 1997. http://padrak.com/ine/INE21.html (accessed April 2016).

2) Aftergood, Steven.”Invention Secrecy Still Going Strong.” Federation of American Scientists, October 21, 2010. http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2010/10/invention_secrecy_2010.html (accessed April 2016).

[/spb_text_block] [/spb_accordion_tab] [/spb_accordion] [spb_text_block pb_margin_bottom=”no” pb_border_bottom=”no” width=”1/1″ el_position=”first last”]

An Appeal to Mysticism

“Shedding New Light on Old Magicks”

[/spb_text_block] [spb_accordion width=”1/1″ el_position=”first last”] [spb_accordion_tab title=”(Astrology) Chizhevsky discovers correlation between sun activity and human behavior on massive scale” accordion_id=”” icon=””] [spb_text_block pb_margin_bottom=”no” pb_border_bottom=”no” width=”1/1″ el_position=”first last”]

“Alexander L. Chizhevsky (1897-1964) was a true interdisciplinary cycles researcher who studied relationships between cosmological variables such as the solar cycle and human health and behaviour including propensity to fighting wars. Most of Chizhevsky’s work was published in French and Russian and so unfortunately still remains unknown to English readers.

 

1) http://cyclesresearchinstitute.org/cycles-research/general/chizhevsky

2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Chizhevsky

[/spb_text_block] [/spb_accordion_tab] [/spb_accordion] [spb_text_block pb_margin_bottom=”no” pb_border_bottom=”no” width=”1/1″ el_position=”first last”]

Intelligent Energies

“When Converging Fields Are Clever”

[/spb_text_block] [spb_accordion width=”1/1″ el_position=”first last”] [spb_accordion_tab title=”Dust forms DNA-like structures when suspended in plasma of charged particles” accordion_id=”” icon=””] [spb_text_block pb_margin_bottom=”no” pb_border_bottom=”no” width=”1/1″ el_position=”first last”]

“Life on earth is organic. It is composed of organic molecules, which are simply the compounds of carbon, excluding carbonates and carbon dioxide. The idea that particles of inorganic dust may take on a life of their own is nothing short of alien, going beyond the silicon-based life forms favoured by some science fiction stories.

Now, an international team has discovered that under the right conditions, particles of inorganic dust can become organised into helical structures. These structures can then interact with each other in ways that are usually associated with organic compounds and life itself.

V.N. Tsytovich of the General Physics Institute, Russian Academy of Science, in Moscow, working with colleagues there and at the Max-Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics in Garching, Germany and the University of Sydney, Australia, has studied the behaviour of complex mixtures of inorganic materials in a plasma. Plasma is essentially the fourth state of matter beyond solid, liquid and gas, in which electrons are torn from atoms leaving behind a miasma of charged particles.

Until now, physicists assumed that there could be little organisation in such a cloud of particles. However, Tsytovich and his colleagues demonstrated, using a computer model of molecular dynamics, that particles in a plasma can undergo self-organization as electronic charges become separated and the plasma becomes polarized. This effect results in microscopic strands of solid particles that twist into corkscrew shapes, or helical structures. These helical strands are themselves electronically charged and are attracted to each other.”

 

Hmm, it could very well be the case that organic life is far more driven by subtle energy fields than anyone might have guessed. What would happen if we empowered those fields further, in ways beyond simple electric charge? What happens to life then?

 

1) Institute of Physics, “Physicists Discover Inorganic Dust with Lifelike Qualities,” ScienceDaily (August 15, 2007) http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/08/070814150630.htm (accessed June 2017).

[/spb_text_block] [/spb_accordion_tab] [/spb_accordion]